Correct use of transactions in SQL Server
Add a try/catch block, if the transaction succeeds it will commit the changes, if the transaction fails the transaction is rolled back:
Add a try/catch block, if the transaction succeeds it will commit the changes, if the transaction fails the transaction is rolled back:
Looking at the SQL Server Books Online, Microsoft seems to have an (incorrect) method of handling nested transactions in a stored procedure: Nesting Transactions Explicit
The good news is a transaction in SQL Server can span multiple batches (each exec is treated as a separate batch.) You can wrap your EXEC statements in a BEGIN
I am trying to use transaction blocks on a SQL-Console with an Oracle DB. I''m used to use transaxction blocks in PostgreSQL like BEGIN; <simple sql statement> END; but in
What is the proper way to test for insert/update failures and rollback this transaction if there are any? I don''t think what I have will work since my inserts/updates are 3
I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration. I have no control over the way this is executed. Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe...
Do u think there is a better way to write a transaction in t-sql? Is there a better approach that improves maintainability and performance of the application that uses this
BEGIN TRANSACTION / COMMIT "extends" this locking functionality to the work done by multiple statements, but it adds nothing to single statements. However, the database
PDF version includes complete article with source references. Suitable for printing and offline reading.